For the record, no.
(Editor’s note After last night’s news, some commenters complained that the picture does not match the description on the photo. In addition, a number of commenters on the forum also posted pictures of the pole with the same name and description.)
By Ryan Nunn, Staff Writer at the Associated Press
OTTAWA Ontario’s top public defender is expected back on the stand on Friday, a day after a judge upheld a lower court’s order granting an injunction against a senior prosecutor who has accused former premier Dalton McGuinty of being involved in the police investigation into Liberal Party allegations of child abuse.
Dalton McGuinty is scheduled to be questioned on charges of allegedly interfering with an inspector’s investigation into allegations that former premier Jean Charest, who served as interim Liberal leader under former prime minister Jack Layton, was involved in a sex scandal involving a high-ranking Liberal staffer.
Ontario Supreme Court Justice Brian Fraser has ordered a review of the investigation into the allegations made by former senior RCMP Chief Insp. Peter MacKay in the wake of two high-profile corruption scandals of late, and a subsequent trial of a former NDP government official.
MacKay had asked Charest to take the lead at the time, but in December 2011 the NDP withdrew an offer to appoint a new RCMP officer to fill his role.
The Supreme Court heard the request in an April ruling that had been filed against McGuinty by the provincial justice. It upheld the ruling after three days of proceedings by a judge overseeing criminal proceedings in Toronto and Queen’s Park.
After the hearing, a Conservative MP, John MacKay, testified that he was asked under oath to help with the RCMP investigation and was asked if he would assist in an investigation into allegations made against him by the MPP.
The evidence in the case was that MacKay was asked to work alongside another deputy who was investigating the police investigation. The former deputy, Andrew O’Sullivan, said that even though O’Sullivan testified under oath that he had told the same question, O’Sullivan was not given a copy.
Dalton McGuinty, left, and Andrew O’Sullivan.
In her complaint, the Ontario Court of Appeal cited MacKay’s decision to have a lawyer help him with the investigation on his own initiative, and that there was no evidence to support his testimony under oath when he gave it under oath.
MacKay argued at trial on
indian pole gymnastics, pole dancing for beginners, miss pole dance, pole dancing championships, pole dance classes